ETF staking addition is ‘positive development,' says ETC Group exec - differences between web 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0.
ETF staking addition is ‘positive development,' says ETC Group exec

The Importance of Staking in Spot Ethereum ETFs: Executive at ETC Group

The inclusion of staking in spot Ethereum exchange-traded fund (ETF) proposals marks a significant milestone, according to Chanchal Samadder, head of product at European investment firm ETC Group.

For ETFs, the staking aspect holds great significance as it determines whether investors receive the price return or the total return of the asset, Samadder told Cointelegraph. This is similar to how shareholders in equities receive dividends, but only if they exercise their voting rights, he added.

Despite the potential benefits of staking, the approval of spot Ethereum ETFs by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) remains uncertain, according to Samadder.

Understanding the Differences Between Web 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0

Web 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 are terms used to describe the evolution of the internet and its technologies. Each version has distinct characteristics and advancements that have shaped the way we use the internet today. In this article, we will explore the differences between web 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 and how blockchain technology plays a role in the development of web 3.0.

Web 1.0: Static Web Pages

Web 1.0, also known as the “read-only” web, refers to the early days of the internet when websites were static and could only display text and images. Users could not interact with the content or contribute their own information. This version of the web was limited in its capabilities and lacked the dynamic and interactive features we have today.

Web 2.0: Interactive and Social Web

Web 2.0, also known as the “read-write” web, marked a significant shift in the way we use the internet. With the introduction of social media platforms, users were able to interact with each other and contribute their own content, making the web more dynamic and personalized. This version of the web also saw the rise of e-commerce and online services, making it a more integral part of our daily lives.

Web 3.0: The Blockchain-Powered Web

Web 3.0, also known as the “semantic” web, is the next step in the evolution of the internet. This version of the web is powered by blockchain technology, which allows for decentralized and secure data storage and transfer. Web 3.0 aims to create a more intelligent and personalized web experience, where machines can understand and interpret data. This technology has the potential to revolutionize industries such as finance, healthcare, and education.

The Importance of Understanding Web 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0

As we continue to see advancements in technology, it is crucial to understand the differences between web 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0. This knowledge can help individuals and businesses stay ahead of the curve and adapt to the ever-changing digital landscape. With the rise of web 3.0, it is essential to keep up with the latest developments and harness the potential of blockchain technology for a more efficient and secure online experience.

Differences between Web 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0: Exploring the Evolution of the Internet

As Fidelity seeks approval for its spot ETF, it plans to utilize trusted staking providers to stake an undisclosed amount of its assets. This move follows Grayscale Investment’s proposal to include staking in its spot Ethereum ETF application on March 20th.

In a recent preliminary statement with the SEC, Grayscale highlighted the potential for its fund to stake ETH through the trust in a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) validation protocol. This is just one of four proposed additions to the ETF.

According to industry expert Samadder, the lack of staking in previous spot Ether ETF applications may be due to its complexity and the high level of technical analysis required by the SEC.

Understanding the complexities of structuring a product requires a deep understanding of Ethereum protocol, ETP mechanics, and the bridge between crypto and traditional capital markets. This process takes time and expertise.

The suggestion was made that the SEC may not have been prepared to properly assess the risks associated with staking.

Categorized in:

Tagged in: